![]() ![]() ![]() We won’t really know which one is better as far as how they’re implemented by Linux/FreeBSD until the FreeBSD developers add KSE support to FreeBSD’s threading library. There’s been a great deal of discussion regarding a 1:1 vs M:N threading implementation. They weren’t “bugs”, it was simply a markedly inferior implementation.Īnd that linux 2.6 will blow freebsd 5.0 out of the water. Linux is attempting something similar with epoll(), however this provides no means of waiting for either socket or filesystem events (Linux provides filesystem monitoring through DNotify)įrom what I have read freebsd 5.0 did NOT fix smp bugs from freebsd 4.x The kqueue mechanism for one, O(1) synchronous, stateful multiplexing of a variety of events. ![]() ![]() What does freebsd offer that linux doesn’t? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |